To press or not to press? In the case of wearables, you should always go with physical buttons. They’re not just on fitness trackers, smartwatches prefer the capacitive and touchscreen buttons. However, it appears that there’s positive news for those who love physical buttons. A leaked image from the Fitbit Versa 4 indicates that the side button is coming back baby.
read our more articles
The image comes directly from 9to5Google It’s a great photo, and generally speaking it appears like the Versa 3 — except when you focus to the right side of the screen, which is where you’ll see tiny buttons that are raised.
It may not appear as it but it’s an important design change. Previous versions of Versa – one of Fitbit’s most-loved devices featured the button on the side. In the event of the release of the Versa 3 in 2020, Fitbit removed the button and replaced it with an indentation that was smooth. It was technically it was a “button,” but it was not something you could press in the traditional sense. Instead, if you did press it properly it would cause it would vibrate. Versa 3 would vibrate. This was similar to the The Fitbit Sense was released in the same year, was also a model with the same design.
At first glance, it seemed reasonable. In theory, having no buttons meant there were no mishaps and a more sleek appearance. However, in actuality, it resulted in poor user experience.
If you apply very little press on Sense or the Versa 3’s switch, it will not accomplish anything. If you press excessive pressure, it might not accomplish any thing. Instead of awakening the screen in the way you wanted it could be triggering an alternative shortcut called long-press. Whatever the reason, the top portion of the button was found to respond more quickly than the lower. If you browse the Fitbit or the Reddit forum discussions there are many users complaining and offering tips for making this button function.
It’s not a new issue. There are many fitness trackers that do not have any type of button or crown. Instead, they depend on touchscreens completely. For instance, on Garmin’s Vivosmart 3 and Garmin Vivosmart 3 and Vivosmart 4 you needed tap the screen in order to confirm your selections. This meant that you had to master the exact timing and pressure every time. If you couldn’t get it right this meant that a two-second exercise could take some time to master. The Garmin Vivosmart fitness devices are my example There are other fitness bands that use touchscreens with the same issue.
The sweaty fingers can be a major problem. Touchscreens aren’t able to detect finger sweat, and they make it more difficult to make use of capacitive buttons. It’s ironic that these are intended to be worn during exercise and thus they become difficult to use when you’re in need of them.
A well-designed physical button can be the perfect solution to these issues. When you spot an actual button, there is no need to be able to operate it. Simply press it and it will do what you’d like it to. If you’re looking to get fancy and program your own nifty shortcuts, such as pausing your music and you won’t have to look at your wristwatch. A physical button doesn’t take into consideration how sweaty or swollen your fingers get. It will always be able to do its job.If you see a physical BUTTON, YOU DO NOT need to be taught how to use it.
The change? The addition of a physical button. Combining a touch screen with an actual button worked perfectly. The touchscreen was a great option whenever it was logical, such as scrolling through menus. However, I could always count upon the buttons to take me back to my home screen or the previous screen or to end an exercise. The button’s addition was the only way to eliminate one of the series’ biggest problems.
This is the primary reason -in the event that this leak is trueit appears that Fitbit has changed its design back to an older model. This is a wise move in the event that it is, and another proof of the most enjoyable experience with your Fitbit using touchscreens as well as physically-based buttons.